Maelstrom 2.0 Military Changes

[PTRILEY]

I was thinking about the poor dwarf... the advent of fortifications makes 599 not such a huge advantage anymore, probably not even used?  I suggest perhaps dwarves build fortifications (and perhaps buildings) at half the food cost.

I agree on fortifications  not every building

[Draugr]

I was thinking about the poor dwarf... the advent of fortifications makes 599 not such a huge advantage anymore, probably not even used?  I suggest perhaps dwarves build fortifications (and perhaps buildings) at half the food cost.

I agree on fortifications  not every building

his ability cost no food so is still an advantage.   I have not tried but would guess he can both 599 make a fortification in the same turn.  perhaps instead of less food(resources) make them get 10 or 20% stronger fortifications.  more Defense due to better engineering.

[VballMichael]

I am playing a DW right now and I use 599 almost every turn. Can't say more right now.

[The Painted Man]

I am playing a DW right now and I use 599 almost every turn. Can't say more right now.

Ooooooh.

[Wookie Panz]

I've noticed when playing a military position I've sometimes wished the 235 reorganize order included leaders.  Sometimes it seems like every encounter and battle generates a new centurion and then when you need to shuffle the groups, say to create an inactive to get reinforcements you can't do it without combining a group and losing a wizard. 

Ry Vor, is this a reasonable request, to be able to eliminate an unwanted leader?

[Ry Vor]

I've noticed when playing a military position I've sometimes wished the 235 reorganize order included leaders.  Sometimes it seems like every encounter and battle generates a new centurion and then when you need to shuffle the groups, say to create an inactive to get reinforcements you can't do it without combining a group and losing a wizard. 

Ry Vor, is this a reasonable request, to be able to eliminate an unwanted leader?

Not unreasonable, just doesn't come up much.  When I turn stuff over to Mike, when Mike is ready to do Alamaze stuff, I have to prioritize lots of stuff, some never gets put in.  

The closest I would come to that Wookie, is the idea of having an ESO reward being to add a 5th group.

[Draugr]

I've noticed when playing a military position I've sometimes wished the 235 reorganize order included leaders.  Sometimes it seems like every encounter and battle generates a new centurion and then when you need to shuffle the groups, say to create an inactive to get reinforcements you can't do it without combining a group and losing a wizard. 

Ry Vor, is this a reasonable request, to be able to eliminate an unwanted leader?

Not unreasonable, just doesn't come up much.  When I turn stuff over to Mike, when Mike is ready to do Alamaze stuff, I have to prioritize lots of stuff, some never gets put in.  

The closest I would come to that Wookie, is the idea of having an ESO reward being to add a 5th group.

ESO for extra group would be cool.   Customization for hidden capital would also be nice.

[Senior Tactician]

I've noticed when playing a military position I've sometimes wished the 235 reorganize order included leaders.  Sometimes it seems like every encounter and battle generates a new centurion and then when you need to shuffle the groups, say to create an inactive to get reinforcements you can't do it without combining a group and losing a wizard. 

Ry Vor, is this a reasonable request, to be able to eliminate an unwanted leader?

Not unreasonable, just doesn't come up much.  When I turn stuff over to Mike, when Mike is ready to do Alamaze stuff, I have to prioritize lots of stuff, some never gets put in.  

The closest I would come to that Wookie, is the idea of having an ESO reward being to add a 5th group.

ESO for extra group would be cool.   Customization for hidden capital would also be nice.

Ohh I like these ideas, but may be too powerful.

[PTRILEY]

I've noticed when playing a military position I've sometimes wished the 235 reorganize order included leaders.  Sometimes it seems like every encounter and battle generates a new centurion and then when you need to shuffle the groups, say to create an inactive to get reinforcements you can't do it without combining a group and losing a wizard. 

Ry Vor, is this a reasonable request, to be able to eliminate an unwanted leader?

Not unreasonable, just doesn't come up much.  When I turn stuff over to Mike, when Mike is ready to do Alamaze stuff, I have to prioritize lots of stuff, some never gets put in.  

The closest I would come to that Wookie, is the idea of having an ESO reward being to add a 5th group.

ESO for extra group would be cool.   Customization for hidden capital would also be nice.

I love these

[Ry Vor]

Both in the update.

February, 2020 Priorities
 
·        SSL Certificate
·        Reorganize the Game Creator and Game Queue
·        Automate the game draft, first come first served for both region and kingdom.  11th and 12th get chivalry bonus
·        Redo Welcome Email to incorporate Training Vault and other Changes
·        Auto Follow Up Email to players who did not attempt Tutorial after 2 days after signup, and separate email to players who did attempt tutorial but have not queued for a Duel or Game after four days after completing tutorial
·        Update to brigade special abilities
·        Update to kingdoms
·        Update to regions
·        Update to spells
·        Update to artifacts
·        Update ESO, Customization, Status Points
·        Update the PC Improvements model
 
Secondary Objectives
·        Integrate calculators for political and agent action probable outcomes
·        Three new kingdoms
·        Power 5 and up cantrips concept