Posts: 1,733
Threads: 14
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
0
(10-30-2019, 07:38 PM)Ashgar75 Wrote: I know that PTM is a good guy and he knows it isn't personal. He may not like my reasoning and in this game may decide that makes us not friends, but everything was above board and he was informed before I took action, so he knows it isn't personal and I have no doubt we will be on better terms in some games and worse terms in others. Each game creates its own Friends and Frenemies. As to my view that it was hostile intention, I would not consider taking a PC in someone's controlled region as a not hostile event. to make matters worse, I offered up those PC's and no one wanted them. It felt a little sneaky. Not accepting the offer, and then moving on some PC's thinking that owning them might keep them under your control even though the region was controlled. That was opportunistic on your part, and that is why I didn't feel bad about being opportunistic on my part. Yes the dispelling of your wizards was a risk, but I left your Adept alone so you had the opportunity to save your leaders and wizards should I be able to destroy your group which I didn't think would happen. It made sense he would go invis and thus you wouldn't lose your wizards should I destroy all your troops. no defensive or offensive spells on your part meant that my attrition would be as minimal as possible. If I truly thought I could wipe out your group knowing you would use a defensive tac of 1, I would have dispelled all three of your wizards to ensure their deaths.
We each have our reasons and take advantage of an opportunity when we think it is appropriate. Your opportunistic decision was met with my opportunistic decision. In the end, you gained more from it than I would think I did. You still have a village (for the moment), and gained resources that should have been mine. You lost some troops which weren't a huge loss. I think you got the better of this one.......................
Totally on the same page. May not agree, but we both know where we stand.
Can we go attack DuPont now?
Also, how dare you refer to my troops as "no huge loss". Two of my only sister's nephews were in that group!
Posts: 504
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
0
(10-30-2019, 07:50 PM)The Painted Man Wrote: (10-30-2019, 07:38 PM)Ashgar75 Wrote: I know that PTM is a good guy and he knows it isn't personal. He may not like my reasoning and in this game may decide that makes us not friends, but everything was above board and he was informed before I took action, so he knows it isn't personal and I have no doubt we will be on better terms in some games and worse terms in others. Each game creates its own Friends and Frenemies. As to my view that it was hostile intention, I would not consider taking a PC in someone's controlled region as a not hostile event. to make matters worse, I offered up those PC's and no one wanted them. It felt a little sneaky. Not accepting the offer, and then moving on some PC's thinking that owning them might keep them under your control even though the region was controlled. That was opportunistic on your part, and that is why I didn't feel bad about being opportunistic on my part. Yes the dispelling of your wizards was a risk, but I left your Adept alone so you had the opportunity to save your leaders and wizards should I be able to destroy your group which I didn't think would happen. It made sense he would go invis and thus you wouldn't lose your wizards should I destroy all your troops. no defensive or offensive spells on your part meant that my attrition would be as minimal as possible. If I truly thought I could wipe out your group knowing you would use a defensive tac of 1, I would have dispelled all three of your wizards to ensure their deaths.
We each have our reasons and take advantage of an opportunity when we think it is appropriate. Your opportunistic decision was met with my opportunistic decision. In the end, you gained more from it than I would think I did. You still have a village (for the moment), and gained resources that should have been mine. You lost some troops which weren't a huge loss. I think you got the better of this one.......................
Totally on the same page. May not agree, but we both know where we stand.
Can we go attack DuPont now?
Also, how dare you refer to my troops as "no huge loss". Two of my only sister's nephews were in that group!
I am attacking Dupont!!!!! He probably hasn't noticed because I sent my heaviest drinkers and they are probably still so stumbling drunk that they might be in Westania at the moment.
Ashgar the Bloodthirsty.
My blood, your blood, what difference does it make!
Time will tell.................
Posts: 1,118
Threads: 34
Joined: Sep 2019
Reputation:
0
WA-RA
I am action challenged, but have the food. I'd trade you 50k food for 5k gold, but you'd agree to move for me +1 influence on the HC and then vote yea sometime in the next 3 turns. If you get outvoted or the motion does not pass, you owe me nothing additional. If you can't get the issue on the HC, you owe me 20k gold for one food.
Let me know... beers after? WA
Posts: 1,118
Threads: 34
Joined: Sep 2019
Reputation:
0
(10-30-2019, 09:26 PM)Pine Needle Wrote: WA-RA
I am action challenged, but have the food. I'd trade you 50k food for 5k gold, but you'd agree to move for me +1 influence on the HC and then vote yea sometime in the next 3 turns. If you get outvoted or the motion does not pass, you owe me nothing additional. If you can't get the issue on the HC, you owe me 20k gold for one food.
Let me know... beers after? WA
open ballot, of course. WAt?
Posts: 504
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
0
(10-30-2019, 09:38 PM)Pine Needle Wrote: (10-30-2019, 09:26 PM)Pine Needle Wrote: WA-RA
I am action challenged, but have the food. I'd trade you 50k food for 5k gold, but you'd agree to move for me +1 influence on the HC and then vote yea sometime in the next 3 turns. If you get outvoted or the motion does not pass, you owe me nothing additional. If you can't get the issue on the HC, you owe me 20k gold for one food.
Let me know... beers after? WA
open ballot, of course. WAt?
RA - WA
Excellent offer and agreed. I will put the order in.
Lord of the Pub Crawl.
Ashgar the Bloodthirsty.
My blood, your blood, what difference does it make!
Time will tell.................
Posts: 1,118
Threads: 34
Joined: Sep 2019
Reputation:
0
Posts: 504
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
0
(10-30-2019, 10:46 PM)Pine Needle Wrote: Ok. Cheers!
RA - WA
The order is in.
Lord of the Pub Crawl!
Ashgar the Bloodthirsty.
My blood, your blood, what difference does it make!
Time will tell.................
Posts: 28
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2019
Reputation:
0
(10-30-2019, 06:20 PM)The Painted Man Wrote: (10-30-2019, 05:58 PM)Ashgar75 Wrote: RA - All
Looking to purchase some food this month. Is there anyone looking to sell extra food they may have. willing to buy 20k-50K food.
Let me know.
Lord of the Pub Crawl!
I'd sell, but unfortunately the merchants that liked you enough to do that were the ones that didn't run away fast enough when you attacked them and sadly perished in your poorly-rationalized assault. The rest were further insulted by the fact that you also tried to include our wizards in the death toll. So, our stores are temporarily closed to you as our way of wiggling our chubby finger back in your direction. We will see if time truly heals all wounds. On your list of dislikes including DuPont, is Ashgar making his way up there? Asking for a friend...
Posts: 1,733
Threads: 14
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
0
Truth of the matter is I like them both more than most.
Posts: 504
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
0
RA - NO
Leave it to Puff to try and stir the pot. I have my eye on you and your Nomadic peoples.
Lord of the Pub Crawl!
Ashgar the Bloodthirsty.
My blood, your blood, what difference does it make!
Time will tell.................
|
