Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Debut Maesltrom Diplomacy
#11
I think everyone should be allow one ally declaration that can last longer than the 3 turns.

Also enemy must stay on an active kingdom. Once a kingdom has dropped or we can see player on hold a new enemy must be declared if one does not already exits.
Reply

#12
I'm not in this one but wouldn't it make sense to run a game without extra add on rules first?
Reply

#13
(02-13-2019, 05:54 PM)Calidor Wrote: I'm not in this one but wouldn't it make sense to run a game without extra add on rules first?

I think RyVor is trying to somewhat set up the new norm for a diplomacy game.   They rarely start with a straight up format.  Also a side aspect is forum only promotes the game as others can follow the action.   

The last every 3 turn diplomacy seemed to go well even though I was not in it myself.
Reply

#14
I'm okay with this and I to prefer Forum Only Diplomacy.
Reply

#15
(02-13-2019, 06:00 PM)DuPont Wrote: I'm okay with this and I to prefer Forum Only Diplomacy.

Same here,  good with it
Reply

#16
(02-13-2019, 05:47 PM)Draugr Wrote: I think everyone should be allow one ally declaration that can last longer than the 3 turns.  

Also enemy must stay on an active kingdom.  Once a kingdom has dropped or we can see player on hold a new enemy must be declared if one does not already exits.

Yes, I didn't mean you couldn't have declared allies and so a full game alliance, just no long term deals with kingdoms that are not declared allies, and if you only had two active (good point Draugr) adjacent kingdoms to your current capital region, one of them would have to be an enemy.

Yes, true its not to mess specifically with a new Maelstrom environment but to "fix" the hesitancy with diplomacy format based on too much requirement for active diplomacy, and again, most importantly, to do away with secret game long or long-term NAPs.
Reply

#17
It's been a while since I've played. And I don't like diplomacy games. But if RyVors suggested format is implemented I would like in on this game. Slot 12.
Reply

#18
1
2 - PTRiley
3 - Draugr
4 - Rellgar
5 - Eregnon
6 - Wookie Panz
7 - DuPont
8
9
10
11
12 - Rytek

Updating chart looks like 5 spots left
Reply

#19
I'm okay with everything except the mandatory enemy declaration. That seems too artificial.
Reply

#20
(02-14-2019, 02:38 AM)Eregnon Wrote: I'm okay with everything except the mandatory enemy declaration. That seems too artificial.

I had mis read that earlier, I thought if you had an ally you had to declare an enemy by turn 5.  Not sure I want to be forced into war by turn 5... idk
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 Melroy van den Berg.