Login

DuPont · 02-25-2018, 08:14 PM

Oh, look, I really don't like the mega-alliance games. To me, if a kingdom goes on the warpath, that would sort of nullify any defense pacts, but others play the game differently. I'm not really a fan of these sorts of Diplo games because they tend to be cliquish and other players WILL stand by and let another player win. I think the next time one of these games comes up, I am going to suggest that we limit NAPs and MDPs to a small number to prevent it.
But to stop something from getting out of hand, let me put my neck on the line as say I was the one sending the naughty agents of Uranus out against the DE. The IL is not responsible for those actions. Our NAP had expired a while ago and my agents, who can only raise to 9, needed some training missions.

Diws · (This post was last modified: 02-25-2018, 08:30 PM by Diws.)

The way I read this exchange the DE suspected me at first, then the IL, but did not know. For the record I didn’t do anything against the DE city around that turn. So take any nearby kingdom who had no agreement with the DE at that time and you have your list of suspects.

Edit: thanks, Uranus

Ohman the heartless · 02-25-2018, 10:57 PM

Great Quicksilver
I have reinstated our trade agreement. If you need to restructure it due to your current lack of City income, just post the new trade. If not back to our original!

DuPont · 02-25-2018, 11:23 PM

(02-25-2018, 08:29 PM)Diws Wrote: The way I read this exchange the DE suspected me at first, then the IL, but did not know. For the record I didn’t do anything against the DE city around that turn. So take any nearby kingdom who had no agreement with the DE at that time and you have your list of suspects.

Edit: thanks, Uranus

Well, I would have just as soon not said it but given that people were starting to point fingers in a rather aggressive way. it's not worth it to me to see that sort of thing. FWIW, Uranus is also facing some hostile agent actions. I have some idea who might be responsible, but it's more a cat-and-mouse whodunit sort of thing with me. Not going to get worked up over it. It's a game, I like to have fun!

IMPERIAL_TARK · 02-26-2018, 04:25 AM

(02-25-2018, 10:57 PM)Ohman the heartless Wrote: Great Quicksilver
I have reinstated our trade agreement. If you need to restructure it due to your current lack of City income, just post the new trade. If not back to our original!

50k/100k food/gold from me for your 45k/90k food/gold is good for this turn!

Draugr · 02-26-2018, 05:48 AM

AN-SO
I think you need to declare me at least neutral for me to gift you income. I already rebelled the city incase you have not moved. I believe you only need to take one more town or village beyond the city to regain control.

Ohman the heartless · 02-26-2018, 12:08 PM

Great Quicksilver
Done and done. 45k food and 90k gold

Ancient Lord
Reclaiming city, 1 town in Torvale. 1 seaside resort in Amberland. And moving to take village failed to take last turn. Declaring you Neutral so no status penalty. No need for gifts as I was well over stocked in food/gold. Please declare me neutral as well.

Thx

Draugr · 02-26-2018, 05:00 PM

AN - SO
Seems I dropped below substantial, so please do not retake the village. I can work from here to get myself back upto my needed census. You can ignor that group...they are there via the powerful typo spell.

Windstar · 02-26-2018, 06:34 PM

DE - WA

I have one turn left in me. I would like to sell you the Gem of Plains for 10,000 gold (the minimum allowed cost).

If you so wish, let me know and I will post the code for the artifact.

Titus · 02-26-2018, 06:56 PM

i WILL TRADE YES