Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Confederation Game
#81
(07-24-2016, 01:57 AM)Atuan Wrote: Yes let's boost them up if possible

3rd Cycle is more complex than before so I don't like to manually change settings but since this game hasn't started yet, I went ahead and gave +25k gold to IL, TY, UN. Let me know if there's an issue with your turn 1 orders.
Reply

#82
It looks good from my end! Thank you unclemike!
Reply

#83
Do we want to maintain a 'silent only' HC from this point forward? I'm not sure if it was explicitly agreed.

No open votes?
-This Khal Drogo, it's said he has a hundred thousand men in his horde
Reply

#84
(08-01-2016, 06:48 PM)Drogo Wrote: Do we want to maintain a 'silent only' HC from this point forward?  I'm not sure if it was explicitly agreed.  

No open votes?
Definitely silent HC. Otherwise you'll end up with--intentional or not--defacto NAPS. The whole point of a silent/no diplomacy game is to avoid that issue.
Reply

#85
I would think the silent warlords type player rules would apply to this game. At the very lease secret HC issues is a good item and no ally besides your other kingdom.
Reply

#86
That's fine with me. All agreed going forward?
-This Khal Drogo, it's said he has a hundred thousand men in his horde
Reply

#87
im good with secret HC votes and vote fails should you put it as open
Reply

#88
(08-02-2016, 02:14 PM)Drogo Wrote: That's fine with me.  All agreed going forward?

Agreed. Obviously Smile
Reply

#89
There was an open HC motion this turn. How do we handle?
-This Khal Drogo, it's said he has a hundred thousand men in his horde
Reply

#90
I believe we all agreed the vote would fail and everyone should abstain. But we are missing two people from this game that never stated they agree.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 Melroy van den Berg.