Warlords

[Ohman the heartless]

I would like to try this format if there are no objections. Non podium player, but will play with no chivalry.

thanks

[IMPERIAL_TARK]

IMP_TARK
Netstrider
Ohman the heartless

Just need one more!!!!

[Ry Vor]

IMP_TARK
Netstrider
Ohman the heartless

Just need one more!!!!

I think there are five players ready for Confederations, or if when Ohman says "this format" of the two formats in the thread he means Warlords, then three for that.

[Ohman the heartless]

Warlords please!

[Ry Vor]

So probably your best shot is if Drogo wants to go Warlords. 

I'd still like players to consider kind of a newbie-to-multi-kingdom game.  Perhaps six players who have never done Confederations or Warlords, or maybe at least did not podium in those formats.  Just think about it - it would be on its own thread if there is interest.

[IMPERIAL_TARK]

I think if you start a new sign-up with the Confederation title you'll get some players to start signing up.

[Lord Thanatos]

IMP_TARK
Netstrider
Ohman the heartless

Just need one more!!!!

Ry Vor enticed me to play a free Warlords to come back to Alamaze.

It is only fair that I at least play one more that I pay for.

I am willing to play Warlords under the format suggested herein.  [A question: did you intend 7 regions? 6 is the usual. I am okay with either.]

*********************
Here's what the Warlords version Netstrider and I are looking to play with two others:

Use the non-dragon, low wizard cap kingdoms. So the 12 kingdoms we’d be drafting from would be:

EL CI DW AM SA AT HA RA LI NO TY PI

With Warlord rules/drafting order below, turns twice a week.

1) Ally declarations, trades, and gifts are only allowed between your own three Kingdoms
2) No HC issues are allowed to help another player's Kingdoms
3) All HC issues must be by SECRET ballot, and if a player accidentally proposes an open ballot issue, all players must abstain on that vote (i.e., it fails)
4) No drops before T20 (i.e., orders issued through T20)
5) Notify everyone as soon as you decide to drop, rather than allowing the computer to do it
6) No sending messages to other players by using new character names
7) No Sea Patrols on T1
8) Anonymous (so nobody knows who is playing which kingdoms)
9) 7 regions to win

Draft Order
A: 1+5+12 (18)
B: 2+8+10 (20)
C: 3+6+11 (20)
D: 4+7+9 (20)

Lastly, hears an optional rule (but would be quite interesting in my opinion) that I propose for drafting. When drafting your 2nd and 3rd kingdom, it may NOT be adjacent to a zone you have already drafted unless there is no other non-adjacent zone left (the two dispersed kingdoms TY and PI can ignore this rule when selected and don’t count as adjacent to any other zone). So for example, if your first pick was the DW in R3 zone, you could NOT later select the CI in R2 or the AT in R6 since they would be adjacent to R3 unless you had no other non-adjacent zones to pick from. The draft judge would enforce this while selecting. This would prevent us from just ending up with our kingdoms clustered in the 4 corners. Just a thought…. if everybody wanted to try it.

[IMPERIAL_TARK]

I'm willing to do 6 or 7 regions, whatever the will of the 4 players is.

Do we have someone that would be willing to conduct the draft for us?

[Jumpingfist]

If the 4 players want to send me an email with there Draft order preferences I will be happy help.

Maelman57@gmail.com

[Jumpingfist]

Draft has started. Expect some delays as it is late now on the East coast so likely at least one person is sleeping