Posts: 682
Threads: 44
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
0
If two groups with different morale and attrition are combined, how are the morale and attrition factors in the resulting group decided?
Is it different when combining kingdom brigades and veterans/recruits/ogres/orcs? (since the numbers in the different brigades may vary thus making averaging out the morale more complicated.)
Posts: 2,252
Threads: 227
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
The brigades carry their percentageof the morale and attrition with them.
Lord Diamond
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.
Posts: 682
Threads: 44
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
0
OK, so if 2400 Kingdom troops at 100% morale combine with 2400 kingdome troops at 90%, then the final group's morale will be 95%?
What about if 1900 Kingdom troops at 100% combine with 2000 veterans at 80%? Will the final be 90% averaged over 2 brigades or will it be averaged over 3900 troops to make 88%?
It doesn't follow the head count, it follows the brigade count.
Posts: 2,252
Threads: 227
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
04-18-2013, 05:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-18-2013, 06:28 PM by Lord Diamond.)
If you have an Army of 9 brigades with 0% attrition and you transfer in 1 brigade that had 10% attrition in its old Group, the new Army Group will have an attrition of 1%.
EDIT: I fixed my math. Thanks Jumbie.
Lord Diamond
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.
Posts: 2,252
Threads: 227
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
The way brigades take damage appears to be very different in Alamaze than in FoR. In FoR, you can lose 10,000 troops, but very few brigades as the attrition to allocated to each brigade. In Alamaze, if you lose 10,000 troops you will liklely lose 4-6 brigades, depending on your attrition. It doesn't look like we'll have any armies running around with 70% attrition; they will be smaller armies, with much less attrition.
This is good in a way, because in FoR you pay the full amount for each brigade regardless of how combat effective they are. On the other hand, you can more easily Heal your damagaed FoR brigades back towards full strength.
Lord Diamond
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal insult or as a criticism of the game 'Alamaze', which I very much enjoy. Rather, I hope that my personal insight and unique perspective may, in some way, help make 'Alamaze' more fun, a more successful financial venture, or simply more sustainable as a long-term project. Anyone who reads this post should feel completely free to ignore, disregard, scorn, implement, improve, dispute, or otherwise comment upon its content.
|
